EricBarger.me

Photography, writing, Apple tech, and more…

Analysis of Inflow and Infiltration from Unsealed Septic Tank Access Ports

Published in:
  • Barger, Eric. "An Analysis of Inflow and Infiltration From Unsealed Septic Tank Access Ports." Concrete Engineering 12, no. 3 (Autumn 2008): 58-59.
  • Barger, Eric. “TMI: Too Much Infiltration!,” Precast Solutions (January/February 2008): 22-25.
Systems with 1,000 septic tanks and/or grease traps that each contain at least one unsealed access port lid could produce as much as 20 million gallons per year of added liquid effluent into the treatment system.
Introduction
Watertight tanks are generally overlooked as a solution to inflow and infiltration (I&I) problems in municipal and decentralized wastewater systems. The use of watertight tanks can dramatically reduce treatment costs, reduce overflow events and help contain the ever-increasing problem of inflow and infiltration. Ideally, the amount of treated sewage effluent should be less than the amount of total purchased water. Activities such as watering the lawn, washing the car and consuming water all account for effluent wastewater being less than purchased water. If the opposite is true, then the sewage collection system is experiencing infiltration.

The two systems analyzed here are decentralized on-site wastewater collection systems. The collection and treatment processes for both systems are handled by a recirculating sand filter (RSF). Both systems are comparable in physical size, customers served, weather patterns and geographical location, and both are serviced by a public utility that provides the public drinking water and sewer collection for each house. The drinking water is metered at each house and monitored monthly for billing purposes. The sewage effluent is pumped to a central treatment facility, where the total treated effluent is also metered.

During a six-month period, water meter readings and treated sewage effluent were carefully monitored for Systems 1 and 2. At the end of the six-month period, the total purchased water and treated effluent for each system were evaluated to determine the treated effluent as a percentage of water purchased. This data provides a basis for predicting future performance while giving a monthly performance snapshot, which allows the utility to be proactive in combating I&I along with other issues that may arise.

System evaluation
Since recirculating sand filters are not significantly impacted by rainfall events, it is assumed that all treated effluent originates from the septic tanks.

The septic tanks used for both systems were manufactured in a National Precast Concrete Association (NPCA) certified plant. The NPCA plant certification program assures a uniformly high degree of excellence in plant facilities, production, processes, and quality control operations. The assurance of watertight tanks for an on-site wastewater collection system is the fundamental key for the system to be successful.

System 1 showed an excess of sewage effluent that entered and was treated in the recirculating sand filter (see Table 1). In other words, the total water exiting the recirculating sand filter was greater than the purchased water amount.

During the same period, System 2 showed the total treated sewage effluent to be less than half the purchased water. Only 44 percent of the purchased water was entering the recirculating sand filter (see Table 2), which demonstrated the system was not experiencing I&I of any significance.
Stacks Image 14
Diagnosing the problem
With System 1 experiencing severe inflow and infiltration problems, the system was analyzed for failures. Tanks used in both systems were provided by a National Precast Concrete Association certified plant, ensuring proven quality construction methods for producing watertight tanks. Having tanks designed and constructed for watertightness from an NPCA-certified manufacturing facility helped reduce the number of areas to inspect for I&I due to the high confidence level earned from the plant certification program.

If a manufacturer without a recognized quality assurance program had supplied the tanks, the cause of the I&I could have been more difficult to find. Common types of failure that lead to I&I are cracked tanks due to no reinforcement; inferior, permeable, low-strength concrete; or the total lack of a high-quality sealant in the joint line. A combination of these problems would require replacing the entire tank with a watertight design that had a plant certification program behind it.

A review of the specifications for the two systems revealed only one difference in the tank requirements: the specification for sealing the inlet access port lid. System 1 did not require the concrete inlet access port lid to be sealed prior to installation, while System 2 did.

After a brief discussion and consultation with the tank manufacturer, engineer and field personnel, it was decided that the first place to check in the collection system would be the tanks. The access ports that were not sealed would be uncovered and inspected first. If the access ports had not shown any signs of I&I, the inspection would be expanded, which would require uncovering and visually inspecting any and all seams and joints on the tanks, risers and inspection ports.

However, when the first tank was uncovered, it was immediately apparent that the inlet side access port lid (see Figure 1), which measured 18 inches in diameter, was allowing surface water to enter the tank. All of the tanks showed varying degrees of I&I during the inspection.

The fix
The next step was to seal each of the inlet access port lids on each tank in System 1 with a high-quality butyl sealant to ensure a watertight seal. Fortunately, the unsealed lid was close to ground level, allowing an easy fix. System 1 and System 2 tank specifications were now identical to each other and should perform equally well against I&I into the collection system. After evaluating the following month’s meter readings, the success of applying the butyl sealant on the inlet access port lids became evident as System 1 showed a dramatic decrease in treated sewage. Sixty percent of the total purchased water was now entering the sewage treatment facility, cutting the treated wastewater by more than half. This validated that the I&I problem originated from the unsealed access port lids. Table 3 shows the purchased water and treated effluent comparisons.
Stacks Image 18
Conclusion
Sewer collection systems are only as good as the weakest component. In this case, failure of the utility to specify proper sealing of the tank totally negated the tank’s watertight design and construction and resulted in the tank being the weakest component in the entire system. Overlooking such a simple precaution to both specify and properly seal a watertight tank can be catastrophic for all sewage collection systems, resulting in system overloads and significantly increased operating costs.

After the breakdown of communication between the utility district and the precast concrete manufacturer, the precast concrete manufacturer reminds each and every customer at the time of product delivery that the use of proper sealant must be used on each and every tank supplied in order for the tank to be watertight. This fact is again resonated at regional industry meetings as a way to cooperate and help utilities managing on-site systems to better install and operate successful operations.

In addition, breakdown in system performances such as I&I can result in overloaded sewage treatment facilities. Based on data collected in this study, systems with 1,000 septic tanks and/or grease interceptors that contain at least one unsealed access port lid per unit could produce as much as 20 million gallons per year of added liquid effluent into the treatment system. To provide long-term system improvement, utilities should ensure that properly designed, properly sealed, durable watertight tanks are installed for wastewater applications.

System 1 - Trouble System

Total water purchased - 253,800 gallons

Total sewer treated - 327,432 gallons

Percent purchased water treated - 129% (bad)

System 1 - Trouble System Post-Fix

Total water purchased - 245,600 gallons

Total sewer treated - 147,300 gallons

Percent purchased water treated - 60% (good)

System 2 - Good System

Total water purchased - 164,700 gallons

Total sewer treated - 73,202 gallons

Percent purchased water treated - 44% (good)


Contact
Contact me here through the web site.

Notice
EricBarger.me makes every attempt to ensure any advice or information contained in this website is accurate and correct. No liability of any kind including liability for negligence is accepted in this respect by EricBarger.me, its servants, affiliates or agents.